Click here to call us +61 2 9929 0226
Posted 08 June 2021
Nuisance is defined by the Oxford Dictionary as: “a person or thing causing inconvenience or annoyance.”
In NSW, private nuisance laws are generally derived from case law (the common law), rather than statutes and legislation.
Nuisance can be used to address a number of environmental concerns including interference with your enjoyment of property caused by dust, noise, vibration, sewerage, odours, light and the flow of water.
The issue of nuisance in strata schemes has always been a controversial and hotly contested issue. Section 153(1) of the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW) sets out provisions regarding nuisance in strata schemes.
There are many instances where you may be causing a nuisance or the victim of nuisance. Generally speaking, the following must be established in order to sue someone for nuisance:
If the wrongdoer has not created the situation which results in the suffering party sustaining damage or liability in nuisance, but the wrongdoer has adopted or continues the nuisance with knowledge of its effect, then nuisance is established (City of Richmond v Scantelbury  VicRp 44; Montana Hotels Pty Ltd v Fasson Pty Ltd (1986)).
It must be reasonably foreseeable that there is a risk of damage if the use of the wrongdoer’s land which amounts to the nuisance is continued (Kaye J in City of Richmond v Scantelbury  VicRp 44).
In determining ‘unreasonable interference’ the Court considers:
There may be some exceptions, but fault of some kind is now usually necessary for liability in nuisance: Sutherland Shire Council v Becker ; Gales Holdings Pty Ltd v Tweed Shire Council .
In Torette House Pty Ltd v Berkman  the Court determined the following principle: “A person is liable for a nuisance constituted by the state of his property … if, when it has arisen without his own act or default, he omits to remedy it within a reasonable time after he did or ought to have become aware of it.”
According to s14(b) of the Limitation Act 1969 NSW, you must commence proceedings within 6 years of the date the nuisance began.
In The Owners Strata Plan No. 72250 v Letmin Pty Limited t/as Dubbo Powder Coating  NSWDC 378, the NSW District Court found in favour of an owners corporation seeking damages from a lot owner.
The lot owner was carrying out an abrasive blasting and powder coating business from his lot.
The Court found that the lot owner was causing a nuisance by allowing the dust created by the business to enter the common property and other lots in the strata scheme.
Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 (NSW) generally applies to any trees causing nuisance to neighbouring properties on urban land.
If the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 (NSW) applies, then you cannot make a claim under the common law action of nuisance in relation to damage caused by that tree.
Therefore, an action of nuisance is only applicable for trees on Council land and/or rural land.
In the case of Dimitrios Michos & Another v Council of the City of Botany Bay , the NSW Supreme Court held that a council was liable in nuisance (and in negligence) for damage to private land caused by tree roots originating from council owned land. The Court awarded damages (compensation) to the owners of the private land against the council and also granted a mandatory injunction requiring the council to take steps to prevent the ongoing nuisance caused by the tree roots.
You may have an action in nuisance if there is noise coming from a lot upstairs due to the installation of hard floors or the noise coming from a nearby property.
In the case of Vincent v Peacock  1 NSWLR 466, the Court held a person’s conduct was in nuisance and granted an injunction restraining a person from engaging in conduct comprised of singing, shouting, whistling and using unseemly words in his own premises, in the street and in a public park when his conduct affected the amenity and reasonable enjoyment of tenants of a house on the opposite side of the street.
You may have an action in nuisance if a lot owner smoking on the balcony of their lot upsets you and/or other lot owners who can smell the smoke in their lot.
In the case of Gisks v The Owners – Strata Plan No 6743; The Owners – Strata Plan No 6743 v Gisks  NSWCATCD 44 (28 May 2019), the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal (NCAT) held that the smoke drift from one lot into another lot was a hazard and that the smoke drift was a nuisance as it was “an interference with the lot owner’s use and enjoyment of their lot which is substantial and unreasonable”. In this case, NCAT made orders preventing the lot owner from smoking on her balcony and requiring her to close windows when smoking indoors.
You may have an action in nuisance if there is toxic mould or other hazardous materials in a lot which may spread to other lots.
In The Owners Strata Plan No. 72250 v Letmin Pty Limited t/as Dubbo Powder Coating  NSWDC 378, the NSW District Court found in favour of an owners corporation seeking damages from a lot owner for causing nuisance by allowing hazardous materials created by the lot owner to enter the common property and other lots in the strata scheme.
Section 153(1) of the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW) specifically sets out provisions regarding nuisance in strata schemes and provides strata owners or occupiers with certain rights.
If you and/or your family has recently or is currently suffering from any of the above, then you may have an action in nuisance.
Our North Sydney Strata Lawyers are available for advice and assistance in the situation of an action in nuisance, feel free to reach out.
***The information contained in this article is general information only and not legal advice. The currency, accuracy and completeness of this article (and its contents) should be checked by obtaining independent legal advice before you take any action or otherwise rely upon its contents in any way.