Click here to call us +61 2 9929 0226

Enquire Now Knowledge Library

Knowledge Library

Filters

Reset

← Return to Knowledge Library

The Subcontractors Conundrum: How the D&BPA Empowers Owners Corporations to Pursue Justice

Posted 26 April 2023

Category: Strata, Building Defects

The Design and Building Practitioners Act 2020 (the D&BPA) is a relatively new piece of legislation in New South Wales, that has significant positive implications for owners corporations and their ability to claim against subcontractors for defective building work. Previously, a claim against a subcontractor for breach of statutory warranties arose if the builder and developer were the same entity, which was rare. However, with the introduction of the D&BPA an owners corporation now has an avenue of recourse against subcontractors.

In accordance with section 7 of the D&BPA, a building practitioner is defined as a person who agrees under a contract or other arrangement to do building work, or if more than one person agrees to do the building work, a person who is the principal contractor for the work. Section 3 of the D&BPA defines design practitioner as a person who prepares regulated designs. These two classes of practitioners include builders, architects, engineers, and other professionals involved in the building process.

One of the key features of the D&BPA is the introduction of a statutory duty of care owed by building practitioners to owners of buildings. This duty of care applies retrospectively to building works carried out after 10 June 2010.

Importantly, the duty of care extends to subcontractors engaged by the principal contractor. This means that owners corporations may be able to claim against subcontractors for defective building work.

Following on from the decision in Roberts v Goodwin Street Developments Pty Ltd [2023] NSWCA 5, subcontractors in substantive control of the works may be found to be personally liable and could be sued up to 10 years after completion of the works. This has given rise to revised insurance and run-off polices.

This has important implications for owners corporations in New South Wales, giving them greater ability to claim against subcontractors for defective building work.

Related Articles

Building Defects: Who pays?

Recent D&BPA Cases

A New Duty of Care: Game Changing Protection for Property Owners

No Duty Owed by Certifying Council

Building Defects: Which Government was responsible for the defects crisis?

Builder gone bust? Making the most of the Home Warranty Insurance?

Related eBook’s

Building Defects Guide Part 1 

Building Defects Guide Part 2

 

***The information contained in this article is general information only and not legal advice. The currency, accuracy and completeness of this article (and its contents) should be checked by obtaining independent legal advice before you take any action or otherwise rely upon its contents in any way.


Bannermans Lawyers

Published 26 April 2023

Download PDF